How Accurate is The New World Translation?

Concerning it’s exactness, the New World Translation has been viewed as “one of the most reliable English interpretations of the New Testament as of now accessible” and is “the most dependable of the [8 major] interpretations analyzed.” – Truth in Translation: Accuracy and Bias in English Translations of the New Testament by Jason BeDuhn, academic partner of strict investigations at Northern Arizona University, in Flagstaff, Arizona

The remarks made by Professor Benjamin Kedar of Israel can be found by tapping on the connection underneath:
http://defendingthenwt.blogspot.com/2009/09/nwt_7717.html

Prescribed Links to Information and Quotes Praising and Supporting the New World Translation: Scholarly Quotes on the New World Translation (From God’s Word)
Benefits of the New World Translation (Jehovah’s Witnesses United)
Benefits of the NWT (In Defense of the NWT)
The New World Translation (Pastor Russell)

Allegations Against The New World Translation Hypocritical

Some have dishonestly blamed the New World Translation Bible for errors, predisposition, and composed by those with unfortunate qualifications. When, in actuality, what sort of certifications do the journalists of practically every other current Bible have? But then these copyists permitted the inclusion the title “Ruler” rather than the heavenly name in the vast majority of the almost SEVEN THOUSAND cases in their ‘interpretation’ of the Hebrew Scriptures. In addition to the fact that this is incorrect, it is an intentional, conspicuous abuse of God’s Name! (Ex. 20:7) The NWT is precise in that it involves God’s Name in all cases found in Scripture. (Additionally see “Jehovah” in The New Testament; Search For Bible Truths)

Likewise, (in contrast to the NWT) the vast majority of these different interpretations utilized were made by the individuals who were impacted by the agnostic ways of thinking and unscriptural customs that their strict frameworks had passed down from some time in the past as well as different impacts. For only one occurrence, most of Bible researchers (counting Trinitarian ones) openly concede that 1 John 5:7 in the It is misleading to King James Version. However, Trinitarian researchers and copyists felt a sense of urgency to ADD it to the Holy Scriptures due to their trinitarian inclinations.
(Additionally see: How Can You Choose a Good Bible Translation?; w08 5/1 pp. 18-22; Watchtower Online Library)